Microsoft Conference Management Toolkit

Request Free CMT Site Login
Show / Hide Table of Contents

HOW-TO: Meta-Reviewer Compares Papers

OVERVIEW

When enabled by the Chair, the Meta-Reviewer will have access to a page that will allow comparisons of papers to be made - which paper is better than another, or which paper is equal to another. It uses Paper IDs to distinguish the papers.

Note

The Chair must also enable the Meta-Review Submission Activity and set the deadline to a date in the future in order for Meta-Reviewers to be able to compare papers.

Important

Papers from different tracks cannot be compared.

META-REVIEWER CONSOLE

  • From the Meta-Reviewer Console click 'Actions>Paper Comparison.' The 'Paper Comparison' page appears.

Meta-Review Compare Papers

PAPER COMPARISON PAGE

Here you can add any number of non-contradicting comparisons between papers. For instance,

  • A > B You prefer paper A over B, i.e. given a choice, you would accept paper A instead of B.
  • A ~ B You consider paper A and B to be comparable and about the same.

Meta-Review Compare Papers

  • Click 'Add Comparison +'

Meta-Review Compare Papers

The action row appears.

Meta-Review Compare Papers

In this case we have 6 papers. Lets' say Paper ID 5 is about the same as Paper ID 9.

  • Click the 'Left paper' dropdown. Pick Paper ID 5.

Meta-Review Compare Papers

  • Click the 'Operatore' dropdown, select the tilde

Meta-Review Compare Papers

  • Click the 'Right paper' dropdown, select Paper ID 9

Meta-Review Compare Papers

  • Click 'Save'

Meta-Review Compare Papers

It shows the comparison equation that Paper ID 5 is approximately equal to Paper ID 9.

Meta-Review Compare Papers

If a comparison is deemed invalid then an alert 'Comparison violation detected' will appear at the bottom of the page.

  • For example we add a comparison that paper 18 is better than 12. Click 'Save'. The alert appears.

Meta-Review Compare Papers

  • Now input the following by clicking 'Add comparison +' and saving after each equation:

2 ~ 9
3 > 5
4 > 9
4 > 3

  • Click 'Get Summary'

Meta-Review Compare Papers

It shows a hierarchal result. What can be derived from the summary is that Paper 3 is better papers than 2, 5, 9; while Paper 4 is beter than all.

Meta-Review Compare Papers

Important

Papers from different tracks cannot be compared.

If a Meta-Reviewer (assigned papers in different tracks of a multi-track conference with the comparison enabled in both tracks) tries to compare papers from different tracks, a 'Bad Request' alert error will appear at the bottom of the page.

In this article
© Microsoft Corporation About CMT | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies | Request Free CMT Site
Back to top